The customer problem
The customer problem
Enterprise applications, automation, and AI agents need tightly bounded machine access without scattering long-lived credentials or broad permissions across every consumer.
Apyrn Vault in development
Define the intended boundary for machine identities and credentials.
Apyrn Vault is being developed for approved OAuth access, credential handling, MCP connections, and machine access to enterprise tools and services. This page describes intended boundaries, not current availability.
Example: an AI agent needs a bounded OAuth connection to one approved operation. Vault is intended to keep the machine identity, credential, scope, and audit responsibility explicit.
In development
Apyrn Vault is in development; no general availability, provider coverage, deployment mode, or completed integration is claimed.
Planned Apyrn One relationship
Vault is intended to participate in the Apyrn One experience, but its product integration and activation model remain planned.
Guided explanation
The better operating model
The better operating model
Apyrn Vault is being developed as a product boundary for approved OAuth connections, credential handling, MCP connections, and machine access to tools and services.
The solution approach
The solution approach
Define the machine identity, approved target, credential boundary, permitted operation, evidence requirement, and recovery responsibility before access is activated.
Conceptual architecture
- 01
Intended to separate machine identity and credential handling from application and agent code.
- 02
Intended to scope OAuth, MCP, service, and tool access to approved organizations, consumers, and operations.
- 03
Intended to preserve audit and recovery context without exposing credential material in customer-facing views.
Enterprise examples
An AI agent needs an approved OAuth connection to a bounded enterprise operation.
An MCP client needs a controlled credential and tool-access boundary for one organization.
An automation owner needs access history and a defined revocation responsibility.
What this enables
Plan machine access around explicit identity, organization, credential, and operation boundaries.
Reduce the need to embed credentials directly in application, automation, or agent code.
Keep intended access, audit, rotation, revocation, and recovery responsibilities understandable.
Scope and qualification
In development; this page describes intended boundaries, not general availability or completed Apyrn One integration.
Supported OAuth providers, credential types, MCP capabilities, deployment modes, and operating guarantees are not yet claimed.
Intended product boundary
Start with the access decision, not the credential alone.
Machine identity
Identify the application, automation, agent, or MCP client requesting access and the organization it represents.
Credential handling
Keep intended OAuth and credential lifecycle concerns separate from application and agent code.
Operation scope
Bind access to approved targets, tools, services, and operations instead of broad environment access.
Evidence and recovery
Define the intended audit, rotation, revocation, rollback, and recovery responsibility before activation.
Conceptual view
A controlled boundary between machine consumers and approved services.
The visual is conceptual and does not represent a generally available topology or completed product integration.
Qualified machine access
The intended boundary keeps organization, identity, credential, operation, evidence, and recovery context together.
Concept only: supported providers, MCP capabilities, credential types, and deployment modes remain unclaimed.Planned Apyrn One relationship
Vault is intended to join Apyrn One, but integration is not claimed today.
The future relationship may bring product access and operating context into the shared experience. Activation, identity flow, provider support, and deployment topology remain subject to product approval.
Discuss the machine-access boundary your enterprise needs to define.
Share the identity, OAuth, credential, MCP, tool, service, and recovery constraints without assuming current product availability.